Q What's the difference between soundproofing and acoustic treatment?
Acoustic treatment, in the context of a recording studio, generally deals with the acoustic
quality of the room from a listener's point of view. In other words, if you monitor in a
control room that has been designed using the correct acoustic treatment, what you hear
is likely to be more accurate than the same recording played back over the same speakers
in an untreated room.
Soundproofing, on the other hand, is specifically designed to increase the degree of
acoustic isolation between the studio and the world outside -- cutting down on noise that
leaks into or out of the studio. Sound isolation works the same both ways, so there's no
difference in approach to keeping sound in or out.
Q I've heard that sticking egg boxes or acoustic foam to walls will help soundproof a
room. Is this true?
Egg boxes can make a marginal improvement to some aspects of a room's acoustics by
breaking up reflections from hard surfaces, but they are virtually useless for
soundproofing. The same is true of lightweight suspended ceilings, acoustic foam and
even Rockwool (Rockwool tends to be used for acoustic treatment or for damping out
resonances inside partision walls. All these materials have their uses, but they're mainly
for acoustic treatment, not for soundproofing).
Q Where can I obtain more information on this subject?
There are past articles on the SOS web site (enter Soundproofing or Acoustics in the Search
facility at
www.soundonsound.com/search), and a couple of my own books are available
from the SOS bookshop (01954 789888), including Creative Recording II and Basic Home
Studio Design. These are good if you want a practical rather than mathematical guide to
the subject. For a more detailed, technical approach, there are some excellent books from
F. Alton Everest, including The Master Handbook of Acoustics.
Q Are you sure I can't use egg boxes?
Quite sure!
Bookmarks